In reviewing posts, I found these questions from the audience at the launch of The Bracelet in Burnie in 2014. They were at the end of an exuberant post from that event. I thought they could use another airing – people ask good questions.
Question and Answer time at the launch of The Bracelet, 2014
Q – Did you have a plan?
A – No. I felt like Dr Frankenstein sometimes, stitching together these pieces that I had written sporadically over the two years to make a whole thing. I had a starting point, an idea for the structure, sort of, and a collection of characters.
Q – What would you do differently next time?
A – Investigate a program called Scrivener. It’s supposed to be brilliant at helping novelists to keep their stuff organised.
Q – What is your next project?
A – It’s a non-fiction work. In May 1945, a training accident at an Army base just outside Wagga in NSW blew 26 young men to pieces. Two days later they were buried in the local military cemetery. It is still the largest military funeral on home soil, but until recently, even the local population was largely oblivious to it. It had been forgotten except by the families of the men. Each of these 26 was only ‘important’ because they were 26. If it had been 19 men killed, it would not be a record and it would be different, perhaps. But each of the 26 left behind a particular shaped hole in their families. And the families are still coping with that gap in their lives. So the book is a way to honour them and acknowledge their grief.
Q – What was the balance of the work your editor did with you – the balance between addressing the commas and the big picture issues?
A – I am fortunate to have a gifted reader in my wife, so she actually did a great deal of the big picture stuff before Kate got to see the manuscript. There were many issues of consistency because of the way I wrote it, in bits and pieces. So I’d ask Mary Ann to read a sequence and she’d provide some feedback about what did or didn’t work for her. Then, as it started to come together, she pointed out the inconsistencies.
I sent the first draft up to James Moloney but her only got through about 90 pages. His response to me was ‘It’s called The Bracelet, but the bracelet appears briefly then disappears for the next 90 pages. That’s a problem.’ So I had to go back to it and do a whole lot of rewriting.
By the time Kate saw the whole work, it had already undergone much revision and ironing out of the wrinkles. Kate, however, also picked up on some big picture issues, such as the beginning, which she thought just did not work. What was the beginning now appears at about page 60 and the present opening sequence was made up entirely.
The new went though the novel line by line. She questioned the punctuation, some of the wording, the images used – everything. A great deal was left unchanged, but I had to justify, to myself as well as to Kate, much that remained unchanged.
Q – What were some of the pieces that you really liked that got edited out?
A – The opening. Even though it appears later in the book in a revised form, it is changed. And there is a section that has a series of letters in it. In the original, there were twice as many, but it was too slow, so I cut them back sharply to keep the momentum of the story going.
Q –What was the problem with the beginning?
A – I was trying to be clever. I wanted to create the echo-effect, a frame for the novel, so that it begins and ends with the same sort of scene, even, the same scene. Very literary, but it didn’t work in this novel. Mary Ann had tried to tell me this much earlier but I didn’t want to hear it. By the time Kate was telling me I had had enough and was ready to concede.
Q –Is there a worry that the editor can have too much say?
A – Yes. A ‘bad editor’ will try to shape a work according to their own ideals. But a ‘good editor’ will point out what does not work, in their view, and there might be a discussion of that and alternatives, and the writer then goes off and deals with it. That’s how the present beginning sequence came to be.
I used to think there was one author, the one whose name appears on the front cover. Not so anymore – it is a collaborative effort. Yes, it is my concept, my drafting, but there has been so much given by others that I really do see it as more a collaborative effort now. Writers need editors.
Q – When you were writing the novel, did you ever sit down to write have nothing happen?
A – Yes. But I couldn’t afford to just sit there and watch the scenery. Sometimes I was not in the right headspace to write the next thing that needs to be written. That was one of the good things about writing the novel in bits and pieces.
There was always research to do if I got really stuck.
But often I could attend to other things, non-creative things like editing, organising files, attending to correspondence, transcribing sections I had written in longhand, etc.
What I found usually happened then was that my headspace would change and I could go on and do some of the creative work.
One of the really liberating insights from the process that came after a while was that so much of what I write gets tossed out. Partly, perhaps, that is because I often need to write myself in to a story or a character rather than make it up in my head first, then write it down. I’d have done it pretty tough if I’d been writing in Jane Austen’s era, or Charles Dickens’ office, working with nibs and ink bottles and loose sheets of paper.
Q – Did you ever want to give up?
A – Yes. The knockbacks, or even worse – the no replies, were hard to take sometimes. To lift my spirits early on a friend told me that no-one can count themselves a real writer until they’ve had 29 rejections. (It actually worked for me!) Then there were the occasions when the sheer enormity of the task left to do – even to finish the first draft – would get me right down.
The launch was a terrific event. We had about 40 folk in the room, and a diverse gathering it was – an AWAS from the base that day, Kath Weale, two young members of the crowd that lined the streets for the funeral, Evelyn Patterson and Dick Bostock, members of Wagga’s RSL Sub-branch and Historical Society, a member of the team that constructed the memorial, Damian Strauss, two of Jack Nixon’s nieces, locals, my wife, artists, historians and friends.
I was also able to publicly and personally thank Zita (DDD) and Maris (Textiles Anyone) for their efforts in bringing the book to print. read more …
My second book is now physically present among us.
And very proud I am! read more …
For the book launch, I asked Kate, my friend and editor, to say a few words about the writing process from her editor’s perspective. With less than 24 hours to the launch, a crisis in her extended family meant she would not make it … so she wrote a letter instead. Mary Ann read it out. It is worth a wider audience, so I have posted it below.
A little background: Kate has decades of experience in the publishing world under a number of different hats. She is also a poet. Put the two together and the girl’s eye for detail and for what is or isn’t working is very keen indeed. Before my final push to find a publisher for ‘The Bracelet’, Kate offered her assistance. I find it difficult to say what exactly she did, but we worked through the novel piece by tiny piece for nearly four months and the final effect was that the writing was elevated to another level.
Anyway, I am deeply grateful for Kate’s experience, her persistence and her friendship. Here’s what she wrote:
This is not any kind of a ‘Dear John’ letter, because we’re not finished, but just beginning – at least, I hope you’ll be delighted to have me murder your commas again when your new book is ready for Torture By She Who Must Be Endured. read more …
at LINC Burnie, 4.30 – 6.00 pm, 12th February 2014
12th February, 2014 -11.50 pm
We did it!
There were 35+ people there. Steve and Rachel Dobbie have the prize for coming the furthest – Sydney! There was lots to eat and drink, though no-one went for the hot drinks … the air-con was out. Despite that, people seemed cheery enough, and we sold 14 books! I would have been happy with a quarter of that number. Ages ranged from 15 years up to somewhere in the 80s. Some have drafts in the cupboard, at least one has a published book to his name, there were more than a couple of projects peeping out, and there were four English Writing teachers in the audience. Daunting.
… WHAT I SAID
…. QUESTIONS & ANSWERS